| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
401. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Marlona Yes, because AFs will the be saviors of low sec. The whole reason lowsec is loathed by many is because AFs simply do not perform well enough there. Cool, we're on the same page now? @Plutonion I don't live in 00. I haven't lived in...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 18:24:00
|
402. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, 122 incoming dps is a huge amount for a frigate that isn't renowned for its tankability. I can guarantee you that the bigger the tank the higher than incoming number goes =P Just to bring you up to speed though, 90% of Amarr AF pilots will ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 17:28:00
|
403. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Takeshi There's are a couple major flaws with your graph. 1. 90 degree transversal is never 90 degrees. Maybe at one point or another, but it's never close to 90 on the regular. 2. A Comet doesn't orbit that close that fast. EFT doesn't account...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 17:17:00
|
404. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ava Starfire wrote: Math. Show it. Wensley showed what we all know... falloff > optimal for actual damage projection with ACs. Your pictures are cute... what do they mean? Math, please? Like, math? You know, numbers? How embarrassing, I m...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:55:00
|
405. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sizeof Void wrote: Nice, but, as others have stated, this steps on the interceptor role as tackler. As you might recall, the MWD sig bonus was specifically added to inty's to give them the unique advantage in this role. Maybe a ROF bonus would...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:49:00
|
406. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My ideas for game changes have remained largely unchanged and publicly documented since early 2009. Among those ideas were some for AFs which are very similar; http://tinyurl.com/6mt9tst After that, I made another iteration prior to applying for...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:37:00
|
407. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Here is a graph with actual values put in: http://i40.tinypic.com/2iu9k3r.jpg RED - Optimal GREEN - Falloff As far as damage goes, the Wolf and Jag are indentical. In reality, the Jag only has 3 turrets, but for the purpose of this experiment ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:26:00
|
408. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Mixed reviews by a tiny handful of people who are vastly outnumbered by those who are pro-boost. Can't please everyone, but we can please the majority. As far as Tallest goes, he's monitoring the thread. I can't force anyone to read bad ideas :p
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:18:00
|
409. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Captain Aanderson wrote: [an awful rendition of a good fit] This was my fit pre "buff", notice the neut. Works wonders against active tanks. No more neut for the hawk, at least not without murdering the tank. Hey guess what, I made it fit fo...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 16:06:00
|
410. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@Wensley I can see where your coming from in regard to the extra slots. I had the same concern until I started playing with them. Then Enyo seems to be the posterboy for THINGS TO LOOK OUT FOR, but in truth, the ship is extremely easy to kill. ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 15:18:00
|
411. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Volstruis wrote: You're probably right and I'm probably just having a bad day. Do you really think it will lead to more diversity? And not FOTM ENYO I've yet to be killed by one of these rampaging Enyos people keeping talking about Not to s...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 14:14:00
|
412. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
IntegralHellsing wrote: Quote: Harpy * Added bonus: -5% bonus to shield resistances You mean +5% to shield resistance bonus on Harpy, not -5% That has something to do with how the bonuses are actually applied. It escapes me at the mo...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 13:51:00
|
413. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sakkar Arenith wrote: Great improvements, especially the overheating ones! while youre at it though, could you possibly add the option to select an ammo switch while a gun or module is running? its highly annoying to first deactive a gun or a...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 12:51:00
|
414. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Feel free to come up with a well thought out idea that would benefit everybody . It seems that a (rather small) number of folks want an AB bonus, without actually looking at the stats. Not everyone fits ABs, and not everyone fits MWDs. The diffe...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 10:00:00
|
415. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lets get a few things straight: Currently, if an well equipped AB AF manages to get a tackle on a cruiser, it's a free kill for the frigate. These changes would not change the fact. In fact, if people were to MWD fit AFs would make it easier for ...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 09:47:00
|
416. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@ Marlona When it's an idea like giving AB speed, then yes. I will fight that idea to the end as it does not work with the current EVE mechanics. Until someone can tell me how it isn't broken and is still useful for the majority, I will have...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 08:59:00
|
417. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@ Zarnark Wolf can't do that much dps AND have that much range, let alone have a tank while doing all of that. The Enyo is the same way, and has really high dps with a really really shoddy tank. The Wolf also has a tracking bonus now, 7.5% per l...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 06:15:00
|
418. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
T1 frigates are still very capable ships, but yes some could use some love. The same applies for T1 Cruisers.
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 01:26:00
|
419. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Captain Aanderson wrote: The hawk got screwed by this update, as was said before it was always a tight fit, and now it has an extra slot without the means to put anything useful in there. For example, to fit a web with a standard AB/scram loado...
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.06 00:26:00
|
420. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
i don't know what you're trying to achieve, but my hawk fits just fine with small booster and mse or medium booster and injector.
- by Prometheus Exenthal - at 2012.01.05 23:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |